1 |
Adopting a Conceptual Validity Framework for Testing in Speech-Language Pathology
|
|
|
|
In: Communication Sciences and Disorders Publications (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Developing a Spoken Language Outcome Monitoring Procedure for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs
|
|
|
|
In: Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Developing a Spoken Language Outcome Monitoring Procedure for a Canadian Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program: Process and Recommendations
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
A comment on test validation: The importance of the clinical perspective
|
|
|
|
In: Communication Sciences and Disorders Publications (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Barriers to implementing evidence-based assessment procedures: Perspectives from the front lines in pediatric speech-language pathology
|
|
|
|
In: Communication Sciences and Disorders Publications (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Validity evidence for the littlEARS early speech production questionnaire: An english-speaking, canadian sample
|
|
|
|
In: Communication Sciences and Disorders Publications (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
© 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Purpose: This study reports validity evidence for an English translation of the LittlEARS Early Speech Production Questionnaire (LEESPQ). The LEESPQ was designed to support early spoken language outcome monitoring in young children who are deaf/hard of hearing. Methods: Data from 90 children with normal hearing, ages 0–18 months, are reported. Parents completed the LEESPQ in addition to a concurrent measure of spoken language development, the Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Test–Third Edition. Normal hearing status and development were confirmed. Results: Traditional scale analyses, in addition to item parameters, are reported. The LEESPQ was highly correlated with the Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Test–Third Edition (r = .92) and age (r = .90) and had high internal consistency (Ω = 0.92). Common factor analysis revealed 2 underlying factors conceptually mapping onto items measuring vocal and symbolic development. A latent traits model was the best fit to the data, and item difficulty broadly conformed to theoretical expectations. Conclusions: The present work demonstrates that the LEESPQ accurately captures early spoken language development in a typically developing group of young children. The LEESPQ holds promise as a clinically feasible, spoken language outcome monitoring tool. Future work to identify differences in performance characteristics between typically developing children and clinical populations is warranted.
|
|
Keyword:
Communication Sciences and Disorders
|
|
URL: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/scsdpub/11 https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0411
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
7 |
Language outcomes in children who are deaf and hard of hearing (Daub et al., 2017) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Language outcomes in children who are deaf and hard of hearing (Daub et al., 2017) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Language outcomes in children who are deaf and hard of hearing: The role of language ability before hearing aid intervention
|
|
|
|
In: Communication Sciences and Disorders Publications (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|